![]() ![]() /usr/lib/R/library ( /usr/lib64/R/library in 64-bit architectures) contains system-provided packages with binary code./usr/share/R contains documentation, licenses and other non-binary files./usr/lib/R ( /usr/lib64/R in 64-bit architectures) contains R binaries and libraries.So it's up to you to choose between much and up-to-date software with a bit chance that something does not work yet as expected, Fedora, a rock-solid LTS release, Alma, or for critical business a license at RedHat to be able to blame a company and get support from them if something does not work.The R installation is divided in two directories: RedHat takes Fedora as base for its Enterprise version with CentOS Stream as intermediate, and Alma and Rocky are derived from this enterprise version, with less packages and less choice of desktop environments but releases with long-term support. 13 months a version is end-of-life and does not get any security updates anymore. I've done in-place upgrades for years now without big problems. But the Fedora lifecycle is relatively short, each half year you can do a major upgrade. All software is packaged to fit within the Fedora infrastructure and is tested before it reaches the release repositories. If you want to keep track with the latest software versions, Fedora is an excellent choice. The same can be said for the devotee members on this forum. The rule everyone follows is "Quality is number one". I feel in my heart, and my "soul" that new Fedora "support/development" developers are very competent, and proud of their deliverables. Since RH has a major client/owner/user, the code better be good, or big-daddy would come down hard on lazies, sloppy, or incompetents (new students mainly). He will not let buggy code to be released, unless you break his arm and then, only if the code is essential for the function that everyone uses, and only if there is a documented fix coming, along with a written acknowledgement of the bug/bugfix to be provided within the release notes. He assures each release and Spins, and is responsible to have test results showing clean operation for the base Fedora and for whatever would be provided within the "official" release. My recollection is that Adam has been looking after Fedora for the past 10 years. ![]() I would presume that Adam Williamson is Mr Quality Control. What I installed and use/used worked to it's design goals. My experience with Fedora over the past 5 releases has been complaint free. It has a very broad range of available packages, and even if it doesn't have a particular thing, as it's one of the more popular and widely used Linux distributions, it is usually easy to find the package you want, and almost as importantly, many articles about how to use whatever software you've chosen. These days, I don't use Fedora commercially, and use a more minimal installation, which gives me fewer things to break, but generally speaking, Fedora is pretty stable, especially for home use. However, since Adam Williamson took over, it seems there is far more effort put towards not breaking things. The downside is that sometimes they will introduce new programs or systems, and things will break. So, if you're not running a commercial server, Fedora is probably the better choice. It is sort of a development platform for RedHat (VERY generally speaking) and will have more programs available that the average home user might want. The packages tend to be conservative, the idea being that you can run an update and all programs will still work, unlike the times when you run an update and suddenly, your website is broken.įor desktop use, Fedora is probably a better choice. ![]() Alma is a clone of RedHat Enterprise Linux, which is designed for servers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |